Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
Since today is the 30th anniversary of that historic decision, I would like to ask this simple question to the pro-abortion crowd: Why would the overturning of
Roe v. Wade be so awful? Let's think about it. What did this legal decision do? The answer is that it invalidated the abortion laws, all passed by duly elected legislatures, of the 50 states. If the Supreme Court were to today strike down
Roe, it would not mean that abortion would be automatically be outlawed; the states would once again be allowed to enact or not enact abortion laws. Some states will restrict abortion, others will keep the status quo, and the rest might extent abortion "rights." The point is that the residents of the individual state would be allowed to either vote on referenda deciding the legality of abortion or elect governors and members of their state legislatures that will pass and sign laws concerning abortion. Why would the pro-abortion Left, who loves to proclaim its devotion to democracy and the "will of the people," be so against letting the people choose?
Maybe they are afraid that the result wouldn't be to their liking...